Refusing to listen to your stupid "Ted Talk"...since 2004
Sunday, December 19, 2010
Thank you sir, may I have another?
People, it just never ends. Now a group in California is suing Mickey D's over their happy meals. It turns out that kids like them and get mad if mom says no. So mom is suing!!
I am not making this up.
Of course mom is not "just" a mom; she's an employee of a state funded vegetable advocacy group.
I am not making that up either.
Remind me again why we need lawyers?
8 comments:
Anonymous
said...
I'll bet she's fat. I haven't seen a picture of her but this type behavior screams out beached whale.
To put a stop to things like this you could start with introducing a proper tort law that caps damages at a reasonable amount and then reform the judicial procedure (no pleading, cross examination; maybe even abandon the jury) and all of a sudden suing for things like this seems not very enticing and people are much less likely to find a lawyer for it.
liability cap is a total non sequitur. Do you actually believe the plaintiff thinks she will win $ from this? This is a publicity stunt to bolster support for limits on marketing directed towards children and nothing more.
Here's what a quick Google image search turned up. Looks pretty chubby to me: http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2010/12/16/article-1339088-0C817C29000005DC-289_468x359.jpg
8 comments:
I'll bet she's fat. I haven't seen a picture of her but this type behavior screams out beached whale.
I have to confess to my sins.
I am personally acquainted with the emeffing lawyer from Dallas that is behind the suit.
$@#!&sucker has been in my home.
I bet you can smell the stench from there.
I don't normally comment anonymously. I don't have the money to fend off lawyers. Yes, I am afraid of them. Kind of sad, huh?
CSPI is behind it. Par for the course.
To put a stop to things like this you could start with introducing a proper tort law that caps damages at a reasonable amount and then reform the judicial procedure (no pleading, cross examination; maybe even abandon the jury) and all of a sudden suing for things like this seems not very enticing and people are much less likely to find a lawyer for it.
liability cap is a total non sequitur. Do you actually believe the plaintiff thinks she will win $ from this? This is a publicity stunt to bolster support for limits on marketing directed towards children and nothing more.
Tell me again why we need California?
Here's what a quick Google image search turned up. Looks pretty chubby to me:
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2010/12/16/article-1339088-0C817C29000005DC-289_468x359.jpg
Next up in the news: Children open up a class-action suit against vegetable growers--turns out parents get mad when the kids say no.
Post a Comment