"One common denominator of successful bike programs around the world —
from Paris to Barcelona to Guangzhou — is that almost no one wears a
helmet, and there is no pressure to do so. In the United States the
notion that bike helmets promote health and safety by preventing head
injuries is taken as pretty near God’s truth. Un-helmeted cyclists are
regarded as irresponsible, like people who smoke. Cities are aggressive
in helmet promotion...'Pushing helmets really kills cycling and
bike-sharing in particular because it promotes a sense of danger that
just isn’t justified — in fact, cycling has many health benefits,' says
Piet de Jong, a professor in the department of applied finance and
actuarial studies at Macquarie University in Sydney. He studied the
issue with mathematical modeling, and concludes that the benefits may
outweigh the risks by 20 to 1. He adds: 'Statistically, if we wear
helmets for cycling, maybe we should wear helmets when we climb ladders
or get into a bath, because there are lots more injuries during those
activities.'" [Elisabeth Rosenthal, NYT op-ed]
I like the comments part of the article. The idiot parade is in full swing. The claim is not that (1) wearing a helmet is a bad idea, or that (2) wearing a helmet should be illegal. The claim is that the statistical risks are in line with wearing a helmet when you brush your teeth. People slip and fall in the bathroom, sometimes, and hit their heads. Not very often. And the survivable accidents on bikes where a helmet matters are statistically rare.
Now I fully expect some goofball to comment and say, "A helmet saved the life of my cousin's stepdaughter!" Yes. And your dad should have worn a condom.
(Nod to Kevin Lewis, who likely wears a helmet when he brushes his teeth)
I like the comments part of the article. The idiot parade is in full swing. The claim is not that (1) wearing a helmet is a bad idea, or that (2) wearing a helmet should be illegal. The claim is that the statistical risks are in line with wearing a helmet when you brush your teeth. People slip and fall in the bathroom, sometimes, and hit their heads. Not very often. And the survivable accidents on bikes where a helmet matters are statistically rare.
Now I fully expect some goofball to comment and say, "A helmet saved the life of my cousin's stepdaughter!" Yes. And your dad should have worn a condom.
(Nod to Kevin Lewis, who likely wears a helmet when he brushes his teeth)
4 comments:
This goofball submits that his friend's brother wore a bike helmet and still got turned into a quad.
-Bayou Jack
"Statistically, if we wear helmets for cycling, maybe we should wear helmets when we climb ladders or get into a bath, because there are lots more injuries during those activities"
That statement is sub-moronic. You should have been tipped off by the fact he started it with the word 'Statistically.' Risk isn't measured by counting up bodies -- it's measured by bodies per unit of exposure. Driving at midnight is riskier than driving at noon, even though more people get killed driving at noon. "Statistically, knife fights are not very dangerous..."
On that score, the article says that the "per mile" risks of walking and biking are about the same. In other words, the per minute risks for biking are much higher than for walking.
Your last point about survivable accidents on bikes where a helmet matters are statistically rare is fair. But, then that statement goes in spades for wearing a seat belt. The "per mile" risks of riding in a car without a seat belt are still orders of magnitude lower than riding on a bike.
Helmets or no helmets, I don't much care. But "your dad should have worn a condom" is priceless.
I just came upon your website and desired to say that I have really experienced studying your website articles. Any way I'll be signing up for your nourish and I wish you publish again soon.A fantastic demonstration. Very open and useful.You have magnificently provided your thought in this short article. Helmets
Post a Comment