Cheap insurance networks are large.
Unless making them large lets sick and expensive people select in.
In that case, it's better to go small. But THIS small? That's small.
The solution? Let vet hospitals treat humans, for cuts and scrapes and broken bones. You can get a two-fer-one deal, where Paco the pup and Angus the guy both get treated. No waiting, adjacent exam rooms!
Nod to WH.
Unless making them large lets sick and expensive people select in.
In that case, it's better to go small. But THIS small? That's small.
The solution? Let vet hospitals treat humans, for cuts and scrapes and broken bones. You can get a two-fer-one deal, where Paco the pup and Angus the guy both get treated. No waiting, adjacent exam rooms!
Nod to WH.
3 comments:
'Unless making them large lets sick and expensive people select in.'
Urm.. making a selection category large has no such consequence.
This is because the selection category can itself impose a deontics militating against not just the reality but the risk of the shite u dun bin talkin.
Anyway, Munger, you fucking racist cunt, you will be pleased to hear my complaint to the British Internet Fraud squad, re. your colleague, Jason Brennan's criminal conspiracy to extort money from me, has led to my being telephoned at work with an OFFER OF RAPE COUNSELLING!
Not the good sort- stuff about how to stop them punching you and pushing you away and then making fun of your penis- not that aty all. I don't know why you'd suggest it.
I'm not saying promises weren't made BUT MUNGOWITZ I ALREADY BOUGHT MY PUFFY DRESS FOR MY INAUGURATION AS FIRST LADY OF WHATEVER THE FUCK GOOBER SHITE YOU REPRESENT.
Mind it kindly.
Also wee gotttta adversarial relationship and for some reason it's REAL important for me to say that.
No, I don't smoke Ganja. Why do you ask?
These comments are now by far my favourite thing on the blog...
Cheap networks are Rawlsian gappy- i.e. racist, sexist and so on.
Post a Comment