One of the problems economists have is that we always ask obnoxious questions.
When I was in grad school, Angus will attest that my obnoxious question was usually, "Hey, bud: you gonna eat that?"
But my current obnoxious question -- and it's the same one that everyone else should be asking -- is "compared to what?"
So, when people say that "You shouldn't eat bacon, meat is bad for the environment!" then you should say, "Well, compared to what?"
Some Carnegie-Mellon U folks did that, and the results are perhaps a bit surprising to the sanctimonious and the environmentally conscious.
The fact is that human beings, just being human beings, are "harmful to the environment."
When I was in grad school, Angus will attest that my obnoxious question was usually, "Hey, bud: you gonna eat that?"
But my current obnoxious question -- and it's the same one that everyone else should be asking -- is "compared to what?"
So, when people say that "You shouldn't eat bacon, meat is bad for the environment!" then you should say, "Well, compared to what?"
Some Carnegie-Mellon U folks did that, and the results are perhaps a bit surprising to the sanctimonious and the environmentally conscious.
The fact is that human beings, just being human beings, are "harmful to the environment."