People, we almost lost the semi-sacred KPC monthly tradition of Christina Romer writing an Economic View column in the NY Times and then me mocking it here.
Almost but not quite.
Almost, because 90 percent of the column about the minimum wage makes total sense.
Not quite because of the following two passages:
1. some minimum-wage workers are middle-class teenagers or secondary earners in fairly well-off households. But the available data suggest that roughly half the workers likely to be affected by the $9-an-hour level proposed by the president are in families earning less than $40,000 a year. So while raising the minimum wage from the current $7.25 an hour may not be particularly well targeted as an anti-poverty proposal, it’s not badly targeted, either.
Yikes! What a low bar Romer has for government. A program that under the most charitable of definitions only hits an intended target less than half of the time is "not badly targeted"?
The official "poverty line" for a family of 4 is $23,000. So less than half of the policy effects hit a population defined as almost double the poverty line. Even for our poor blind doddering Uncle Sam, that is shitty targeting.
2. Then there are the last two sentences of the piece:
And pre-kindergarten education, which the president proposes to make universal, has been shown in rigorous studies to strengthen families and reduce poverty and crime. Why settle for half-measures when such truly first-rate policies are well understood and ready to go?
Please note that pre-K had not been mentioned at all in the previous 16 paragraphs of the op-ed. Only in the penultimate sentence does Romer pull the pre-K rabbit out of her hat, informing us that "rigorous studies" show it reduces poverty, among other wondrous things. She links to a review article which does not present any evidence that pre-K reduces poverty!
Yes, the EITC is a much better targeted and effective anti-poverty program than is the minimum wage. Good on Romer for saying so. But throwing in universal pre-K as a "well understood and ready to go" poverty reduction program is what kept our KPC tradition alive for another month at least.
I feel like I owe it so someone.
1 comment:
WHITE LOANS
Windsor House, Greville Road,
Bristol, BS3 1LL United Kingdom.
Email: whiteloans@admin.in.th
White Loans is a trading name of Freelancer Financials Ltd, Avondale House, 262 Uxbridge Road, Middlesex, HA5 4HS.
Company Number: 07676401.
Data Protection Number: Z2957996.
CCL Number: 562464
We specialise in finding short/Long term credit solutions for customers in the hurry. The instant payday loans available through this contact can be arranged online without deposit of valued asset.
It can occasionally take up to three working days to have the funds cleared, depending on who you bank with. Most mainstream banks however are extremely quick at allowing you to access the funds.
Our service is available to you at 2% interest rate. We do however receive commission from payday lenders and brokers when customers enter into a consumer credit agreement with the them, having been introduced via our service.
Specialize in offering:
*Refinance
*Home Improvement
*Investment Loan
*Auto Loans
*Debt Consolidation
*Business Loans
*Personal Loans
*International Loans.
Applying for a payday loan through White Loans couldn’t be easier. Simply choose how much you’d like to borrow and when you intend to pay it back.
If you really acknowledge this content, you are to send the details information to the account overleaf.
EASY WAY TO APPLY.
(1) Full Name:
(2) Loan Amount Needed:
(3) Duration of Repayment:
(4) Country:
(5) Marital Status:
(6) Gender:
(8) Age:
(9) Occupation:
(10) Mobile:
Email: whiteloans@admin.in.th
Tel: +447042035199
CUSTOMER CARE
Enjoy Online Transfer Services.
Post a Comment