Wednesday, March 20, 2013

Ownership and Physical Currency

Money is essential: Ownership intuitions are linked to physical currency 

 Eric Luis Uhlmann & Luke (Lei) Zhu Cognition, May 2013, Pages 220–229

Abstract: Due to basic processes of psychological essentialism and contagion, one particular token of monetary currency is not always interchangeable with another piece of currency of equal economic value. When money loses its physical form it is perceived as “not quite the same” money (i.e., to have partly lost the original essence that distinguished it from other monetary tokens), diminishing its intuitive link with its original owner. Participants were less likely to recommend stolen or lost money be returned when it had been subsequently deposited in an electronic bank account, as opposed to retaining its original physical form (Studies 1a and 1b). Conversely, an intuitive sense of ownership is enhanced through physical contact with a piece of hard currency. Participants felt the piece of currency a person had originally lost should be returned to him rather than another piece of currency of equivalent value, even when they did not believe he would be able to tell the difference and considered distinguishing it from other money illogical. This effect was reduced when the currency had been sterilized, wiping it clean of all physical traces of its previous owner (Studies 2a, 2b, and 3).

Nod to Kevin Lewis

1 comment:

Tom said...

Meanwhile, bitcoin is trading at $59.50; Uhlmann & Luke have written a psychology paper and with limit applicability, at best.