Saturday, February 06, 2010

Fiscal follies

Joe Stiglitz, Robert Reich and Paul Krugman are all beating the drums for a second stimulus, more spending, and no current fiscal re-trenchment.

Let me politely as possible say that these drumbeats have everything to do with politics and nothing much to do with economics.

(1) GDP growth has turned the corner and job growth will follow. Job growth almost always lags GDP growth coming out of a recession. According to Jeff Frankel, a member of the NBER business cycle dating committee, this recession is not unusual in that regard.

(2)  I cannot help but laugh when I read people saying the first stimulus was too small or that we need a second stimulus. People, something like $500 billion of the first stimulus (i.e. more than half) has not even been spent yet. What the first stimulus definitely was is TOO SLOW! This is not surprising because the stimulus bill enacted had a lot more to do with politics than with economics.

(3) As we look at the world scene today, the problem of excessive sovereign debt seems to be at least as big of an issue as does the problem of insufficient aggregate demand.

(4) Yes, unemployment is bad. Yes, people are out of jobs due to no fault of their own, victims of bad corporate management, short sighted unions, and financial hijinks. If we had a program that would increase employment at a cost that was less than what the people employed in the program would earn, I would have favored it a year ago.
But no matter how much evidence we see, somehow we still can't face up to the fact that, while in theory it may be possible to do so, our government as currently constituted cannot create jobs in anything resembling a cost effective manner.

(5) One of the last things we need right now is more cost-ineffective pro-cyclical fiscal policy.

 

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

1) What happened to job growth the last recessions?

2)Amount is not a good metric. What is the percent of GDP?

3)non-sequitur?

4)new deal?

5)Why can't we try to make it cost effective?

Angus said...

Dear Anon: WTF?

1. the provided link gives the info you seek

2. when talking about the fact that much of the existing stimulus money has not actually been spent, the amount is relevant.

3. right back 'atcha?

4. "The phrase, our government, as currently constituted" would rule out disinterring FDR, but what in the world are you trying to say? That we should put people out digging ditches? good luck with that.

5. Well, my opinion, as repeatedly stated in the post is that political ideology is blocking that from happening. Though if by "we" you mean me and you, feel free to post your ideas and I'll give you some feedback!

Tom said...

Angus for president!

As to (5), evidence supports Angus. One "stimulus" proposed was a 100% tax cut, to last as long as our tolerance for deficit (which is HIGH). This money would have gone into the economy immediately -- or sooner! But no... politicians want to exercise power more than they want air to breathe.

To totally change the subject: don't say in-my-opinion. Readers of the blog jolly well know it's your opinion, good sir.

seslimuhabbet said...

Really trustworthy blog. Please keep updating with great posts like this one. I have booked marked your site and am about to email it to a few friends of mine that I know would enjoy reading
Sesli sohbet Sesli chat
Seslisohbet Seslichat
Sesli sohbet siteleri Sesli chat siteleri
Sesli Chat
Sohbet Sesli siteler
Sohbet siteleri Chat siteleri
Sohbet merkezi chat merkezi
Sesli merkezi sesli Sohbet merkezi
Sesli chat merkezi Sohbetmerkezi
Sesli Sohbet Sesli Chat
SesliSohbet Sesli chat siteleri
Sesli sohbet siteleri SesliChat
Sesli Sesli siteler
Seslimuhabbet sesli muhabbet
sesli sohbet sesli chat siteleri
sesli sohbet siteleri sesli chat
seslisohbet seslichat
seslikent sesli kent
sesli sohbet sesli sohbet siteleri
sesli chat sesli chat siteleri
seslisohbet seslichat