Damn! Munger v. Google has such a nice ring to it. But it was rejected by the NC Supreme Court.
Sure, it was actually "Munger, et al. v. State of North Carolina." But it was Google that took all that cash and built a "server farm." (That's basically an insulated warehouse with some extra HVAC, btw)
We had brought suit, and I was lead Quixote...um... lead plaintiff. (Robert Orr did all the work, of course. I was just eye candy. Or maybe BOB was Quixote, and I was Sancho Panza. That's more like it.)
But the NC Supreme Court today smashed all my dreams. Went so far as to say that the very idea of reviewing the review of the appeals decision was "improvidently granted." Oh, that hurts. Improvidently granted? "Sorry, nothing to see here folks. Just an everyday violation of the NC Constitution. Move along, citizens, move along. Because there is NO STANDING! NO STANDING."
1 comment:
Taxpayer standing is always a tricky business, and the courts are always going to show deference if they can.
It would be nice if any constitutional amendments to define ' public purpose' for takings were to apply the same standard to uniform taxation cases.
Also, who was feeding the cat?
Post a Comment