Bruno Latour (who should have been a porn star, with that name. Far better than the intellectual pornography he sold as scholarship!) is surprised anyone took him seriously.
Okay, he's got a point. No one should have taken him seriously. He claimed that planes don't fly, that color tvs don't really work, and that nothing really is real. It's all socially constructed.
And somehow he got this from misreading Kuhn. (Don't just read on, that link is cool!). Latour wrote drivel like this. (Feel FREE to skip that link).
I have long been amused at how many people whose bizarre minds give them no hope of understanding science use Kuhn as a shield, saying there is no SUCH THING as science. Yeah, I hope that works out for you, pumpkin. Read some more French philosophers, by all means. And get hilariously hoodwinked by Dr. Sokol, of course.
Anyway, having sown the wind, now they can reap the climate change denier whirlwind. Far and away most Americans believe that climate science is fabricated, at least in part. Socially constructed, indeed.
And the response by Bruno Latour? Two parts, both delightful.
1. I never really meant that. Never meant what I said I meant, it was all just an intellectual exercise. Lighten up!
2. Besides, in spite of everything I said about science being socially constructed and unreliable, and measurement being impossible, we ALL KNOW that global warming is real, a fact, an undeniable truth.
Golly, Bruno, and you know that...how?
The answer, as always with the left, is that their feelings, their group-think intuitions, generally anything they happen to believe? THOSE are facts.
Actual facts? Things like prices, scarcity, logic, evidence? THOSE are socially constructed. Nice.
3 comments:
I don't have my pulse on academia or the left in general, but isn't your comment about the "left" a bit indiscriminate? I sure many who are on the left understand and respect scarcity, logic, etc.
People who understand scarcity, and basic economics, are called "ex-leftists," pumpkin.
Sokal claims to be a lefty. Not sure what he knows about scarcity and basic economics but he seems like he is a decent physicist.
Post a Comment