Kids Prefer Cheese
Credibly promising to be irresponsible...since 2004!
Friday, June 22, 2012
TWITTER!
follow Angus: @ez_angus
follow Mungowitz: @mungowitz
Previous Posts
- Ben Bernanke: rainbow warrior
- Unflinching Triumph
- Just in case you still like Roger Federer
- They Done Made Him MAD, Now
- one picture is worth a thousand notes?
- de gustibus non est disputatum
- P-Kroog on Colbert
- Wal-Mart: Neither Here nor There, Except When It'...
- Better adjust my priors about Toronto
- I'll Just Pick Up
Subscribe to
Posts [Atom]
Angus has been called a "libertarian clown," and Mungowitz has been called a "vanity candidate." And
those are our FRIENDS. Still, here they are....
The Cheesiest!!
- Anti-Climacus
- Aretae
- Austrian Addict
- Austrian Economists
- Marc Bellemare
- Beyond the GOP
- Bleeding Heart Libertarians
- Betsy's Page
- Bob Lee Says
- La Bocca della VeritÃ
- Brendan Nyhan
- Bubbles and Busts
- Cafe Hayek
- Carpe Diem
- Cold Spring Shops
- Crooked Timber
- Dan Drezner
- Delaware Libertarian
- Division of Labour
- EconLog
- Economist's View
- Fruits and Votes
- Jay Greene
- Steven Greene
- Hornberger's Blog
- Int Pol Econ at UNC
- Italian Allegro
- Knowledge Problem
- Jacob Levy
- Liquidity Preference
- Locker Room
- Jayson Lusk, Food Economist
- Marginal Revolution
- Market Urbanism
- Matt Dickenson
- (The) Mess That Greenspan Made
- (The) Monkey Cage
- Newmark's Door
- Point of Law
- Popehat
- Pretense of Knowledge
- Price of Liberty
- Reason-Hit and Run Blog
- Samizdata
- Sober Look
- Sports Economist
- Two Weeks Notice
- WILLisms
- VoluntaryXchange
- Will Wilkinson
- Young, Hip, and Conservative
Previous Posts
- Ben Bernanke: rainbow warrior
- Unflinching Triumph
- Just in case you still like Roger Federer
- They Done Made Him MAD, Now
- one picture is worth a thousand notes?
- de gustibus non est disputatum
- P-Kroog on Colbert
- Wal-Mart: Neither Here nor There, Except When It'...
- Better adjust my priors about Toronto
- I'll Just Pick Up
Subscribe to
Posts [Atom]

2 Comments:
What's really weird is that I was just listening to Meddle, and the somewhat random sounding piano melody at the beginning of Echoes reminded me of my computer music class and using Markov chains to generate derivative music works. All of that got me on a Wikipedia distraction chain. I skimmed the article but didn't see any mention of Markov chains in particular, but they're obviously pretty relevant.
Having read it closer, it's a very interesting idea. I think one crucial test of the viability of his theory is whether it can progress music beyond its current character (or multitude of characters). It could be that the system is very good at producing things that appeal to us as familiar music. Can it be so "visionary" that it gives people what they don't even know they want yet?
...Although, that may mis-characterize the way music has changed throughout history. Were Haydn, Bach, Beethoven and Mozart really groundbreaking? Or were the changes much more marginal?
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home