The core of his argument is that:
When citizens in a poor constrained society are very unequally endowed, they are likely to
find it hard to agree on reforms, even though the status quo hurts them collectively. Each
citizen group or constituency prefers reforms that expand its opportunities, but in an unequal
society, this will typically hurt another constituency’s rents. Competitive rent preservation
ensures no comprehensive reform path may command broad support. The roots of
underdevelopment may therefore lie in the natural tendency towards rent preservation in a
divided society.
P.S. Dan Sutter and I took a crack at why reforms are delayed a while ago (paper is here).
No comments:
Post a Comment