Aaaargh!
They are giving waivers now for targets that come due in 2014!
Of course, "comply or face the consequences" is totally out of the question. Just ask Matt Yglesias:
"Simply refusing to grant waivers would be an unworkable non-starter. The issue is whether to just hand the waivers out, or to impose conditionality."
Anybody still think we can pass a bill now that actually would lock in long-term deficit reduction?
Anyone?
Bueller?
2 comments:
But Rule of Man is so much more flexible than Rule of Law! Ask any tin-pot dict…er benevolent savior.
Is this lawful, or lawless?
.
Post a Comment