Kids Prefer Cheese
Credibly promising to be irresponsible...since 2004!
Wednesday, June 24, 2009
TWITTER!
follow Angus: @ez_angus
follow Mungowitz: @mungowitz
Previous Posts
- Iranian Non-Election
- Econtalk: Franchises
- Not Sure About This....
- A Cookie for your guess....
- Faculty Turtles, and Media Relations
- Hotel Sublim Eiffel in Paris
- Regimes and the Rule of Law
- Free! Fearing Aix-en-Provence...
- Best Signs in the World--1
- The YYM in Europe
Subscribe to
Posts [Atom]
Angus has been called a "libertarian clown," and Mungowitz has been called a "vanity candidate." And
those are our FRIENDS. Still, here they are....
The Cheesiest!!
- Anti-Climacus
- Aretae
- Austrian Addict
- Austrian Economists
- Marc Bellemare
- Beyond the GOP
- Bleeding Heart Libertarians
- Betsy's Page
- Bob Lee Says
- La Bocca della VeritÃ
- Brendan Nyhan
- Bubbles and Busts
- Cafe Hayek
- Carpe Diem
- Cold Spring Shops
- Crooked Timber
- Dan Drezner
- Delaware Libertarian
- Division of Labour
- EconLog
- Economist's View
- Fruits and Votes
- Jay Greene
- Steven Greene
- Hornberger's Blog
- Int Pol Econ at UNC
- Italian Allegro
- Knowledge Problem
- Jacob Levy
- Liquidity Preference
- Locker Room
- Jayson Lusk, Food Economist
- Marginal Revolution
- Market Urbanism
- Matt Dickenson
- (The) Mess That Greenspan Made
- (The) Monkey Cage
- Newmark's Door
- Point of Law
- Popehat
- Pretense of Knowledge
- Price of Liberty
- Reason-Hit and Run Blog
- Samizdata
- Sober Look
- Sports Economist
- Two Weeks Notice
- WILLisms
- VoluntaryXchange
- Will Wilkinson
- Young, Hip, and Conservative
Previous Posts
- Iranian Non-Election
- Econtalk: Franchises
- Not Sure About This....
- A Cookie for your guess....
- Faculty Turtles, and Media Relations
- Hotel Sublim Eiffel in Paris
- Regimes and the Rule of Law
- Free! Fearing Aix-en-Provence...
- Best Signs in the World--1
- The YYM in Europe
Subscribe to
Posts [Atom]

1 Comments:
Well, one could take as a starting point:
(1) We have institutions (including a Congress with single-member, first-past-the-post districts) that mean only two parties have a nontrivial chance of winning anything significant.
(2) The officeholders under the current institutions have every incentive to leave the institutional rules alone rather than make changes that would allow additional parties to matter.
Given that we're stuck with our two-party institutions, then if Libertarians want to "matter"--and if "matter" is defined as being one of the two significant parties--then the Libertarians need to do one of two things.
(a) take over an existing major party--and I think generally the Libertarians feel the Republican party offers a better opportunity for such a takeover than does the Democratic party, or,
(b) wait for a major party to disintegrate, be in a position to absorb enough members from the newly-defunct party to become the new #2, and do well enough to become one of the two major parties henceforth.
Strategy (b) has not worked since the Republicans used it when the Whigs collapsed. Despite recent electoral failure and party infighting amongst the Republicans, I still think taking it over is probably a more viable strategy than waiting for it to evaporate. It certainly worked for the social conservatives.
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home